Saturday, March 03, 2007

Why the BBC Video is Important

"9/11 Changed Everything"

Can you remember when and who first spoke the phrase, "9/11 Changed Everything"? Within a day or two of 9-11-2001, pundits began this curious chant. The phrase persisted through the publication of the 9/11 Commission Report where, on page 328, you'll find:

However, the attacks of 9/11 changed everything. Less than one week after September 11, an early version of what was to become the Patriot Act (officially, the USA PATRIOT Act) began to take shape.

But who seeded that phrase into media consciousness? I surely thought it odd at the time. 9/11 didn't change everything for me.

Someone Planted a Story for the Media

Who seeded the media with the notion that WTC7 collapsed because of fire and damage? The same entity responsible for releasing the soon-to-be news a tad too early, that's who. That's why the recently unearthed BBC video is so important. You know, the footage where Jane Standley reports that the Salomon building (aka WTC7) has collapsed, only it is quite uncollapsed in the view out the window behind her.

At about 5:10 in the video linked above, Jane makes a rather honest observation: "It looks like the aftermath of a huge Atom bomb or something..."

How Perceptions are Formed

This video is called The911Solution. Watch how the news was massaged from the very beginning. After all, if we see it on TV, it must be true, right?

To All the Debunkers...

...who suggest that it would be perfectly ridiculous for bad guys to pre-announce their dirty deeds: you must not be astute or educated enough to grasp the fact that the television is a tool to brainwash the masses. The purpose of the news feed that made it on air too early was not to pre-announce a crime. Its purpose was to provide an explanation (fire and damage) for WTC7's collapse to replace the only other conclusion people could have reached had they been left to their own observations (that WTC7 was imploded in some sort of pre-planned demolition).


RighteousG said...

Have you ever heard of people taking gueses. I mean look at the f'n building and how it collapsed. who would of thought anything else but fire structural failure?

1) it had a big whole
2) it was on fire
3) it buckled starting with the part on fire and then came down

Hmm - the guy was no genius - but he got his 15 minutes of fame. . which is what he wanted

Ennealogic said...

Who would have thought anything else but fire structural failure?

Me. And thousands of other folks who watched the video of the collapse. The big hole in the building is not visible in any publicly available photos. Please, if you have some evidence of this, let me know!

There were a couple small fires on two floors out of 47. If you can find evidence of any steel-framed building collapsing due to fire, ever, except on 9-11-2001, I'd love to hear about it.

The collapse was symmetrical. Had a portion of the building been compromised due to fire or damage, logic dictates that the building would lean and then maybe tip. It did neither. The videos of the collapse show a perfectly symmetrical free-fall implosion, directly into the building's footprint. What underscores the strangeness of this is that neither building to either side of WTC7 is seriously hurt.

BTW, did you know that WTC7 has been completely rebuilt already? I didn't. Check it out.